Saturday, April 3, 2010

Kafur: A testament to Levantine racism and Egyptian tolerance

The story of al-Mutanabbi and Kafur al-Ikhshidi testifies to Levantine/Iraqi racism and Egyptian tolerance.

The notorious satirical poems in which the Iraqi/Levantine poet Abut-Tayyib al-Mutanabbi insults the ruler of Egypt Abu al-Misk Kafur Al-Ikhshidi for being a former black slave and mocks the people of Egypt for allowing him to rise to power and accepting him as their leader, is often cited as an example of Arab racism. However, I see it as an example of tolerance, particularly on behalf of the people of Egypt.

Abu al-Misk Kafur was originally a black slave from Ethiopia. Muhammad Bin Tughj, the first of the Ikhshidid princes of Egypt, purchased Abu al-Misk Kafur as a slave in 923 AD and, recognizing the slave's potential, made him a tutor to his children and a military officer, and later promoted him as minister (Vizier) of Egypt. Eventually, Kafur gained so much power that he succeeded bin Tughj after his death, becoming the de jure ruler of the Egypt and southern Syria.

For a black save to climb the power ladder to become a prince or king is quite extraordinary and it took al-Mutanabbi by surprise. Not only was this black slave able to take control of Egypt—one of the most important countries of that time—but the people of Egypt were fine with it.

This is not the only example of slaves rising to power in Egypt. The Mamluks were soldiers of slave origin who converted to Islam, and eventually became a powerful military caste in various Muslim societies, particularly in Egypt. The mamluk phenomenon lasted from the 9th to the 19th century AD.

However, Kafur was not only a slave—he was black. Also remarkable about him is the way he outsmarted and made a fool out of al-Mutanabbi (perhaps the most famous Arab poet in Arabic history).

After trying unsuccessfully to gain political power in the Levant, by praising Saif al-Daula, Prince of Aleppo, al-Mutanabbi went to Egypt and tried to get close to Kafur in hopes of being appointed governor of Sidon in reward for his poetry.

Kafur could see through al-Mutanabbi's praise poetry that he was actually a racist and ignored him. Al-Mutanabbi became furious and started mocking him instead.

Here are some verses of scathing satirical poems Al-Mutanabbi wrote about Kafur:


صارَ الخَصيُُ إمام الآبقين بهـا .. فالحُـرُّ مُستعبدٌ و العبدُ معبودُ

The neutered slave has become leader of free people (in Egypt). The free are now enslaved and the slave is worshiped.

لا تشترِ العبد إلاَّ والعصا معـه .. إنّ العبيدَ لأنجـاسُ مناكيــدُ

Never buy a slave unless the stick come comes along with him. Slaves are sleazy and belligerent.

ما كنت أحسبني أحيا إلى زمنٍ .. يُسيء بي فيه عبدُ وهو محمودُ

I never thought I would live to a time when a slave would insult me and he would be praised for doing so.

من علّم الأسود المخصي مكرمة .. أقومُــه البيضُ أو آباؤه الصيدُ

Who taught the neutered black man to become noble: his white people or his aristocratic fathers?

وتعجبني رجلاك في النعل إنني .. رأيتكَ ذا نعل إذا كنت حافيا

I am amused by how your feet look in your shoes. I would think you had shoes on even if you were barefoot.

ومثلك يؤتى من بلاد بعيدة .. ليضحك ربات الحداد البواكيا

A person like you is sought from far away places just so he can make sad, morning women laugh.

For establishing support and credibility, Kafur was more comfortable surrounding himself with religious scholars than with poets.

Al Mutanabbi mocks the people of Egypt and their religious scholars for accepting Kafur as leader by saying:


سادات كل أناس من نفوسهم .. وسادة المسلمين الأعبد القزم

The leaders of all nations are from amongst themselves, except the Muslims; their leaders are low-life slaves.

أغاية الدين أن تحفوا شواربكم .. يا أمة ضحكت من جهلها الأمم

Is shaving your mustaches the most important thing in religion? You are surely a nation that all nations have laughed at because of your ignorance.


Well, look who got the last laugh!

9 comments:

هشام مصيطف عبد الجواد said...

Dear Lina,

I agree with you about Kafur, and disagree about your view of Almutanabi. Kafur's rise to power is truly amazing, and could be considered as a testament to the tolerance of Islam and Arabs in general. There are other complications, however, about this view arising from the scandalous history of our Arab nation. For sometime early in the Abbasid Califate, the Arabs became content to be ruled by sons of slave girls, other slaves and slave soldiers (al mamleek). This is what allowed Kafur, the black ex-slave to be accepted as ruler of Egypt.
I think it is very harsh of you to condemn my beloved Almutanabi as a racist. It is true that his poem is awful, and has been used by our enemies (see for example Bernard Lewis in his book about slavery in Islam) as evidence of our racism towards the black race. The truth, however, is the opposite. Almutanabi has by far more poems praising Kafur. History books tell us that Almutanbi erased many poems in which he praised Kafur from his Diwan. He only kept the ones which allowed him to interpret as having double meaning.
I do condemn racism against any race, but taking the poem by Almutanbi (the greatest poet in all time and among all nations) out of contest is not fair. The two men had a quarrel, a sever quarrel at that, and Almutanbi allowed his rage to make him write what you quote above. Please remember that our poet was killed for cursing another man in the same severity he did to Kafur.

I congratulate you on your nice blog.

Best regards,
Hisham Abad, PhD

A said...

so what's your point!?

Anonymous said...

Mr. Hisham Abad's point is to contradict himself. He must be a lit. teacher and it was a weekend.

Anonymous said...

Lina
I cannot agree more with you. Just because Almutanabbi is a famous poet does not justify him getting away with what he did. Had he criticized Kafur for being a bad ruler (which no one mentions he was) then his poem would be acceptable. But to mock someone based on race, it is unacceptable in Islam what so ever. Again, I am not surprised at him doing this looking close at his character. He is an arrogant opportunistic self-centered person. One reason we tolerate his poem in the Erab world is because most people in the arab world has no respect to other races or ethnicities. we mock people based on race, ethnicity and belief and take it lightly, something which is really not acceptable in Islam or any self respecting civilization. I really enjoyed your commentary and I fully agree with you. Best Regards.....

Anonymous said...

first of all.
all of you forgot the Historical Fact and relationship of Almutanabi and Kafoor the Slave. At that time Poets were Lobbyist of the old age. and Almutanabi helped Kafoor rise to power by creating poems that served that purpose on a Promise from th SLAVE Kafoor the Ungrateful to give him a little land in Iraq to rule unto. well Kafoor made it to power with his revolution and when time came to pay his friend Almutanabi, he told him to F---off. so in a way the poet used his words as a weapon, and it worked cuz throught history that verse lives. so Lina sorry that ur hurt, but the fact is i just heard of you, but i knew of the Almutanabi about 20 years ago....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Anonymous said...

"For a black save to climb the power ladder to become a prince or king is quite extraordinary and it took al-Mutanabbi by surprise. Not only was this black slave able to take control of Egypt—one of the most important countries of that time—but the people of Egypt were fine with it."
;) the people of Egypt were fine for the 30 years that Mubarak ruled....so what makes you think that the Eqyptian people are a fine speciemen of a Free people.

Mo said...

Allow me to doff my hat in salutation and admiration of your great,great essay ,Ms. Lina.
I would like to also bring the attention of this commentator, Mr Hisham, to a focal point he missed in your essay, which's that you haven't actually described Almutanabbi in anyway,whether positive or negative, you only spotted some lines in his poems and explained the meaning of their words. and that's very objective and very professional and that's the scientific way of argument, to shed light on the subject matter rather than on the writer's feeling and reaction to the subject matter. excuse me Mr. Hisham but you have completely missed the essay and its points.

Anonymous said...

I wonder why this issue is so important. You can't paint the character a whole people through out many generation by the work of one person or several people for that matter. Mutanabbi was know for his ambtious drive and his diwan against kafur was politically motivated rather than racial. the fact that kafur was accepted as a ruler in egypt over a mostly white Arabic north african population is a prime example of Muslim and arabic tolerance. this fact happened over 1000 years ago. contraste this with western countries where no person of color ever ascended to the ruling position. Just recently, USA elected a "black man" but you can see the racist innuendos in the media and outright racism when people speak about him. I like to know who's more advanced vis a vis race relations. travel far and wide and you will never see the examples of tolerance shown in the Muslim/Arabic world.

Anonymous said...

Lina , i do not know you ,but i am very proud of your couragous work you have done in this blog .

Post a Comment